Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Moody

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2012No. 11 CA 874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Yeager v. Moody,

2012-Ohio-1691.] STATE OF OHIO, CARROLL COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ANN YEAGER ) CASE NO. 11 CA 874 ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT ) ) VS. ) OPINION ) PAUL MOODY, et al. ) ) DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES ) CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Carroll County, Ohio Case No. 11 CVB 26795 JUDGMENT: Reversed and Remanded. APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Ann Yeager, Pro se 3546 Steubenville Road, SE Amsterdam, Ohio 43903 For Defendants-Appellees: Atty. Jennifer Thomas Thomas Law Firm 26 Second Street, SE P.O. Box 235 Carrollton,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beer v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bundschu v. NaffahOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Wilson v. Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Guisinger v. SpierOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Nelson v. RodriguezOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Givens v. LongwellOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Yeager v. MoodyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API