Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2000No. Nos. 99AP-1333, 99AP-1334PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George, Judge.

On September 15, 1999 and September 17, 1999, plaintiff-appellant, Kenneth Jay Wilson, filed two separate complaints in the Ohio Court of Claims against defendant-appellee, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, along with affidavits of indigency requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis in lieu of paying filing fees and costs. The Clerk of the court accepted plaintiffs complaints and docketed them. Subsequently, however, the Court of Claims denied plaintiffs motions to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his complaints for failure to pay the requisite filing fees.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re SindramSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Guisinger v. SpierOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Trumbull Memorial Hospital v. Karnofel, 2008-T-0115 (3-31-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Yeager v. MoodyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Galluzzo v. BradenOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API