Legal Opinion
Harley & Browne v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 4, 1997No. 88 Civ. 3559 (DNE)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Presently before this Court is a petition for attorneys’ fees brought by Harley & Browne (“petitioner” or “HB”). This petition is opposed by respondents Ressler & Ressler (“RR”), Rachel Hake and Terry Hake (the “Hakes”), and the United States of America (the “Government”) (“respondents”). For the following reasons, the petition is denied.
BACKGROUND
The action underlying this petition, Hake v. United States, 88 Civ. 3559(DNE), was a medical malpractice action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act. That action sought damages for a botched surgical…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Baylis v. Marriott Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stair v. CalhounDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Moffat v. Branch ex rel. VincoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- ANTONMARCHI v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Moffat v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.