Legal Opinion

Matter of Lieberman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1991No. 90-996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

After conceding that he could not successfully defend himself against charges of misappropriating client funds, respondent consented to disbarment from the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of Maryland. Upon being notified of the outcome of the Maryland proceedings, this court suspended respondent and ordered him to show cause why identical discipline should not be imposed in this jurisdiction. Respondent, through counsel, stated that he was unable to show cause. Accordingly, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that this court disbar respondent.

Reciprocal discipline is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LiebermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Córdova GonzálezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
  2. In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re BendetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In Re ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API