Legal Opinion

In Re Thomas

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 2001No. 00-BG-231PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this reciprocal discipline case, the District of Columbia Board of Professional Responsibility (“Board”) recommends that respondent Douglas R. Thomas be disbarred based on his February 18, 2000 disbarment on consent by the Court of Appeals of Maryland. Thomas admitted to violating Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(b), (c) and (d), and consented to disbarment.

Bar counsel reported the Maryland Court’s order of disbarment to this court on March 3, 2000. On March 13, 2000, this court suspended Respondent pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(d) and ordered the Board to recommend whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re DietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Kelsey v. RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Matter of LiebermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re SteelyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. In re KovenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In re RehderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API