Legal Opinion
BWP Media USA Inc. v. Rich Kids Clothing Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 1, 2015No. Case No. C13-1975-MATPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
MARY ALICE THEILER, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff BWP Media USA, Inc., d/b/a Pacific Coast News (“BWP”) filed this copyright infringement suit against defen*1245dant Rich Kids Clothing Company, LLC (“RKCC”). The Court entered judgment in favor of RKCC and denied BWP’s motion for reconsideration. (Dkts. 30, 31, 59.) Now before the Court is RKCC’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees. (Dkt. 32.) For the reasons discussed below, RKCC’s motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
BWP, the owner of many photographs featuring celebrities, alleged RKCC, a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BWP Media U.S. Inc. v. Polyvore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Benchley Ventures, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Broadcast Music Inc v. QM Entertainment LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Broadcast Music, Inc., et al. v. QM Entertainment, LLC d/b/a Quarter Mile Bar & Grill, and Lester TrummertDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026