Fine v. Loew
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen McGivern, J.
Fine Sound, Inc., a defendant in the principal suit, and plaintiff in the counterclaim interposed herein, has brought on this motion for an injunction pendente lite restraining each of the defendants named in said counterclaim (1) from engaging directly or indirectly, in any business in competition with Fine Sound, Inc., and (2) from using the name “Fine Recording, Inc.” or any other name containing the word “Fine”.
Preceding this motion, the plaintiff in the principal suit, one C. Robert Fine, a well-known expert and pioneer in the field of sound recording and re-recording, brought suit…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Taendsticksfabriks Akticbolagat Vulcan v. MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frederick Chusid & Company v. Marshall Leeman & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- NICHOLS-MORRIS CORPORATION v. MorrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Rundquist v. LeibowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1959