Legal Opinion

Rundquist v. Leibowitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.

This is an application in a taxpayer’s action for a temporary injunction to enjoin the defendants from allegedly committing a waste of public funds and to restrain a Grand Jury in Kings County and the District Attorney of said county from proceeding with an investigation, the purpose of which is allegedly illegal.

The complaint herein and the moving affidavits alleged in substance as follows:

A Grand Jury duly empaneled in the County Court of Kings County by Honorable Samuel S. Leibowitz, a Judge of that court, known as the Welfare Grand Jury and whose term has been duly extended, has been and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McClure v. . LeaycraftNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Southern Leasing Co. v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Jones v. PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. In re Lundy, New York County Courts1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rodin v. Director of PurchasingNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. O'Hara v. Corporate Audit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API