Legal Opinion

Pierce Couch Hendrickson Baysinger & Green v. Freede

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 1997No. 84946PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The issues in this case are (1) whether the trial judge properly construed the contract for attorney fees and costs in the underlying case, (2) whether the costs incurred in the underlying ease were reasonable, (3) whether the attorneys fee incurred by the plaintiff law firm in the present case were reasonable, and (4) whether the trial judge erred in awarding prejudgment interest.

I. Facts

The plaintiff in this case is the law firm of Pierce, Couch, Hendrickson, Baysinger & Green (law firm), and the defendant is Dr. Henry J. Freede, a client of the law firm. The law firm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Withrow v. Red Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Taylor v. Chubb Group of Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Charles S. Barker Express Golf, Inc. v. Golf U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. K & K Food Services, Inc. v. S & H, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API