Legal Opinion

People v. Stanton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1977No. Docket 58626PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was charged with being an inmate in possession of a weapon which might be used to injure a convict or to assist a convict to escape. MCLA 800.283; MSA 28.1623; 1909 PA 17 as amended by 1972 PA 105. The determinative issue is whether the 1972 amendment to § 3 of 1909 PA 17 violates the title-object limitation in Const 1963, art 4, § 24. The circuit court quashed the information on the grounds that the statutory language did violate the title-object limitation, but the Court of Appeals reversed over the dissent of Judge Maher. 69 Mich App 495; 245 NW2d 106 (1976). Pursuant to GCR…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maki v. City of East TawasMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. StantonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Midland Township v. State Boundary CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. GratschMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. RauMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. RoweMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. GoulettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API