Legal Opinion

People v. Stanton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1976No. Docket 25551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

Defendant, a prison inmate, was charged with unauthorized possession of a weapon. MCLA 800.283; MSA 28.1623. On April 9, 1975, the trial judge granted defendant’s motion to quash the information. In so doing, the judge held that a 1972 amendment to the above-cited statute was unconstitutional because the subject matter contained in the amendment was not evidenced in the title of the act and because the amendment *497was vague and overbroad. The people appeal as of right. We reverse.

In 1909; the Michigan Legislature enacted Public Act 17, which was designed to keep weapons, liquor and narcotics…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. MiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. MacLean v. State Board of Control for Vocational EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HerronMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. StantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Adams v. Wayne County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. StantonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. StantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API