Legal Opinion

Midland Township v. State Boundary Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1977No. Docket Nos. 57720, 57732, 58223, 58236, 58242-58245. (Calendar Nos. 1-6)PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The State Boundary Commission was created to consider petitions for the incorporation and consolidation of cities and villages. Its powers were subsequently enlarged to include petitions for annexation of territory to a city.

In these actions, consolidated on appeal, town-, ships from which the commission ordered territory detached and annexed to adjoining cities and persons residing in those townships challenge the constitutionality of the enabling legislation.

Court of Appeals panels, affirming judgments of the circuit courts, held the enabling legislation to be violative of the Title-Object…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Detroit v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bloomfield Charter Township v. Oakland County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Mooahesh v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Rudolph Steiner School v. Ann Arbor Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API