Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting of Hale

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1931PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

By the sixth clause of his will Justus Miller provided that the residue of his estate should be held in trust and that the income therefrom should be paid in equal shares to his widow and to his son during their lives. In the event that the son without issue should predecease the widow, he devised and bequeathed by the seventh clause one-half of the trust estate to the widow and the other half to such named nephews and nieces as might survive the son. Among the four executors and trustees appointed by the will were William P. Hale and the widow, Elizabeth Miller. In 1897 the will was probated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reed v. . McCordNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Townshend v. . FrommerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. In Re the Accounting of BeeckmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Watkins v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Clapp v. . McCabeNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. Rothwell v. RothwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. In Re the Will of McManusNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. In re the Estate of SaphirNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
  5. In re the Estate of CruikshankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API