Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Boudreaux v. AlFord

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 7, 1944No. 36935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

In these mandamus proceedings, the relators, Jesse Boudreaux, J. M. Roux and L. O. Damon, are seeking to be reinstated as employees of the Department of Public Safety and to obtain a judgment for their salaries, at the rate of $165 each per month, from January 15, 1941 until such time as they are restored to their employment.

Alleging that they were illegally dismissed from their employment, without written charges having been preferred against them, without having a hearing and without a compliance with the provisions of Act No. 94 of 1936, as amended by Act No. 57 of 1938,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Norris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Ricks v. CloseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  5. Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chriswell v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Benoit v. DevillierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Dantzler v. Hammond Fire & Police Civil Service BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API