Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 20, 2018No. CR-17-891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Dissent · BakerKaren R. Baker, Justice

I must dissent from the majority's decision to affirm Fletcher's sentence of life imprisonment and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. I would order rebriefing and deny the motion to withdraw.

As explained by the majority, Fletcher's counsel has filed a no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion requesting to be relieved a counsel. Pursuant to Anders , we are required "after a full examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396. If we find "any of the legal…

Also in this document: Dissent · Hart.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bly v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Kou Her v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walter McCray, Jr. v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Friday v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Heath Mabry v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Orlando Dominguez v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  5. Bobby Wyles v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API