Legal Opinion

Kay v. Copper Cane, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 14, 2021No. 3:20-cv-04068Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BARRY N. KAY, et al., 10 Case No. 20-cv-04068-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER DENYING IN PART AND 12 GRANTING IN PART WITH LEAVE COPPER CANE, LLC, TO AMEND MOTION TO DISMISS 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Plaintiffs Barry N. Kay and Bryan J. Dodge Jr. bring this putative class action challenging 17 as misleading the labels affixed to a line of Defendant Copper Cane, LLC’s (“Copper Cane”) pinot 18 noirs. Specifically, they claim to have been deceived by references to the wine’s appellation of 19 origin in Oregon…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API