Mid-Continent Engineering, Inc. v. Toyoda MacHinery USA, Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. After a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the court grants defendants’ motion in part.
BACKGROUND
This contract dispute arises out of plaintiff Mid-Continent Engineering, Inc.’s 1 (“Mid-Continent”) 2001 and 2003 purchases of horizontal machining centers 2 from defendant Toyoda Machinery USA, Corp. (“Toyoda”). 3 Each machine contained spindles that operated at a speed of 20,000 revolutions per minute (“RPMs”). The spindle speed controlled…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Northwest Airlines, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Astraea Aviation Services, Inc., Doing Business as Dalfort Aviation, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bollom v. Brunswick CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Sportsman v. California Overland, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018