Legal Opinion

Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft v. Olson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2000No. 00-0792PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Hecht, joined by Justice Owen, dissenting from an Order of the Court striking the petition for review and requiring that it be redrawn.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of petitioner’s special appearance. Petitioner asserts that this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal because the court of appeals’ decision conflicts with six prior decisions of other courts of appeals on material questions of law.1 The jurisdictional statement in the petition for review, filed July 31, 2000, explains the nature of the conflicts in just over five pages. Respondents filed a waiver of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City Nat. Bank in Childress v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diversified Financial Systems, Inc. v. Hill, Heard, O'Neal, Gilstrap & Goetz, P.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Bellorin v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
  3. Diversified Financial Systems, Inc. and Diversified Financial Southeast, Inc. v. Hill, Heard, O'Neal, Gilstrap & Goetz, P.C. A/K/A Hill, Gilstrap, Moorhead, White, Bodoin & Webster, a Professional Corportion, Dwight A. Heard, Frank Hill, Jointly and Severally, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  4. Diversified Financial Systems, Inc. and Diversified Financial Southeast, Inc. v. Hill, Heard, O'Neal, Gilstrap & Goetz, P.C. A/K/A Hill, Gilstrap, Moorhead, White, Bodoin & Webster, a Professional Corportion, Dwight A. Heard, Frank Hill, Jointly and Severally, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API