Legal Opinion
Bellorin v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided August 30, 2001No. 7:01-cv-00034PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
FURGESON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Emergency Motion to Remand by the Plaintiffs Carolina Pru Bellorin, et al. (“Plaintiffs”), filed on July 10, 2001, in the above-styled case. After careful consideration, the Court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs’ Motion should be GRANTED.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs are Mexican and Venezuelan citizens who allegedly have suffered personal injuries and property loss as a result of automobile accidents involving Ford Explorers. According to Plaintiffs, in all of these accidents, at least one of the tires on…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Betts v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
- Paolino v. Argyll Equities, L.L.C.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2005
- Interstate Service Provider, Inc. v. JordanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2021