Legal Opinion

Rolnick v. Rolnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 1, 1967, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment predicated upon the ground that the cause of action alleged in the complaint is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order reversed, with $30 costs and disbursements, and summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, dismissing the complaint. In our opinion, regardless of the label applied by plaintiff, the cause of action alleged is for the traditional tort of inducing a breach of plaintiff’s employment contract. The cause of action accrued on…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Jemison v. CrichlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Van Dussen-Storto Motor Inn, Inc. v. Rochester Telephone Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Sherman v. St. Barnabas HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. Woodbridge Plastics, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API