Legal Opinion
Woodbridge Plastics, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 2, 1979No. 78 Civ. 5709PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Woodbridge Plastics, Inc. (“Woodbridge”) brought this action against defendants Borden, Inc. (“Borden”), Pickwick International, Inc. (“Pickwick”), and Keel Manufacturing Corporation (“Keel”) for violations of the federal anti-trust laws and for intentional interference with contractual relations. Each of the defendants has moved for dismissal of the anti-trust claims as time-barred. Borden has also moved for dismissal of the claim of intentional interference for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For reasons that follow, we grant each of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation, Columbia Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Charlotte Telecasters, Inc., and North Carolina Cable, Inc., Television Presentations, Inc. v. Jefferson-Pilot CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- The Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Eileen Bailey v. Grand Trunk Lines New England, Canadian National Railway, Midline Division, St. Lawrence RegionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Wolf v. Wagner Spray Tech Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DiMassaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Chatham Brass Co., Inc. v. Honeywell Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.