Legal Opinion
State v. DR
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 9, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
109 N.J. 348 (1988)
537 A.2d 667
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
D.R., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 29, 1987.
Decided February 9, 1988.
Steven M. Gilson, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender, attorney).
Larry R. Etzweiler, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Larry R. Etzweiler and Richard W. Berg, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- State v. BankstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. M.Z.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- State v. MZNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990