Legal Opinion
State v. M.Z.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 15, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARK A. SULLIVAN, JR., J.S.C.
The issue in this case is one of first impression. It involves the application of Evid.R. 63(33) which was adopted June 13, 1989. That rule provides:
*447“A statement by a child under the age of 12 relating to a sexual offense under the Code of Criminal Justice committed on, with, or against that child is admissible in a criminal proceeding brought against a defendant for the commission of such offense if (a) the proponent of the statement makes known to the adverse party his intention to offer the statement and the particulars of the statement at such time as to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BrileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. DRSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MichaelsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- State v. KrivacskaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- State v. D.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. RomanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- State v. BurrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.