Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 1, 2016No. S15A1705PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAHMIAS, Justice.

Appellant Christopher Anton Smith challenges his convictions for malice murder and other crimes in connection with an armed robbery during which Russell Roland was fatally shot and Victor Powell was injured. Appellant contends that his right to be present during trial was violated when the court removed a prospective juror from the venire when Appellant was not in the courtroom and that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in several ways. We reject these contentions and affirm Appellant’s convictions, but we vacate the trial court’s judgment in part and remand…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Vega v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. Hanifa v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Burney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  2. Stafford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  3. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  4. Champ v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API