Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Schofield

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 27, 1987No. 5924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the granting by the trial court of the defendant’s motion to modify that portion of the judgment of divorce relating to alimony. The issues raised on appeal are (1) whether the court erred in finding that the increase in the plaintiff’s income due to her obtaining employment subsequent to the divorce was not contemplated by the parties, and (2) whether the court abused its discretion in reducing the alimony payments to the plaintiff by $50 per week. We find no error.

*522The parties were divorced in 1972. The defendant was ordered to pay alimony in the amount of $100 per…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grayson v. GraysonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  2. Grayson v. GraysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Palazzo v. PalazzoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. Vanderlip v. VanderlipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  5. Wingerd v. WingerdConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Pollio v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Fisher v. FisherConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Greene v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API