Norton v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston
Plaintiff in error Virgil Norton, hereinafter called the defendant, was indicted on 3 separate charges for possessing intoxicating liquor, was convicted on each indictment and was sentenced to serve 6 months in the county workhouse but in 2 of the cases the sentences were suspended during good behavior; he was also fined $150 in each case.
The brief of the Attorney General succinctly states the questions raised as follows:(1) The evidence preponderates against the verdict and in favor of the innocence of the accused in that the whiskey found by the officers was not in the defendant’s *658home but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hopson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Welch v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Hicks v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Brewer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Peters v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LakinTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Chico v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965