Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramirez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 15, 1989No. Nos. 89-1698 to 89-1703PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

These are six appeals from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motions to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that continuing the trial would violate their rights against double jeopardy. We stayed the trial pending resolution of the double jeopardy issue. See Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 662, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 2041, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977).

I

Defendants were indicted on May 17, 1989 for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (aider and abettor = principal) and 46 U.S.C.App. § 1903(a), (c) & (f). The indictment charged that on May 12, 1989, the defendants were on…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Pedro R. Victoria-Peguero, United States of America v. Fernando W. Anglada AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Maria R. Navarro De Cosme v. Hospital PaviaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Charles Williams, Claddis Arrington, Mary Ferguson, A/K/A "Mary Davis", A/K/A "Mary Johnson", and Brooks Gregory DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API