Legal Opinion
Hata v. Los Angeles County Harbor/UCLA Medical Center
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 6, 1995No. B074307PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KITCHING, J.
Defendant and appellant County of Los Angeles (County) appeals from the order of the trial court granting plaintiff and respondent Daryl K. Hata’s (Hata) motion for a new trial on his claim for damages based on the negligent conduct of Los Angeles County Harbor/UCLA Medical Center and its medical personnel. Hata was nonsuited on his case-in-chief based on immunity conferred on County pursuant to Government Code section 854.8. The trial court subsequently reversed its position and granted Hata’s new trial motion on the ground County waived its right to rely on this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Buford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- McMahan's of Santa Monica v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Knight v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Quigley v. Garden Valley Fire Protection Dist.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Jessen v. Mentor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- McCoy v. Pacific Maritime Asso.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Jessen v. Mentor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Complete Escrow Service v. Flagstar Bank CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.