Piggly Wiggly Clarksville, Inc. v. Interstate Brands Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM. *
Plaintiffs Piggly Wiggly Clarksville, Inc. et al. bring this interlocutory appeal of the district court order denying class certification under Rule 23(b)(3). We affirm.
“[T]he district court maintains great discretion in certifying and managing a class action. We will reverse a district court’s decision to certify a class only upon a showing that the court abused its discretion, or that it applied incorrect legal standards in reaching its decision.” Mullen v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLC, 186 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir.1999) (citations omitted). The decision turns on the unique facts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Mullen v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Kenneth Lehrman v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. AT&T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richard Tredinnick v. Jackson National LifeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. v. Service Corp. InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Masquat v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.