Legal Opinion

In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust Litigation

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 22, 2016No. MDL No. 2328PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*660ORDER AND REASONS

SARAH S. VANCE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants Pool Corporation, SCP Distributors LLC, and Superior Pool Products (collectively, “Pool”), move to exclude the testimony of Dr. Gordon C. Rausser, an expert for the Direct-Purchaser Plaintiffs (DPPs).1 The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions and has heard oral argument on the motion. For the following reasons, the Court grants defendants’ motion in part and denies it in part.

I. BACKGROUND

This is an antitrust case that direct-purchaser plaintiffs (DPPs) and indirect-purchaser plaintiffs (IPPs) filed against Pool…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Addison v. Louisiana Regional Landfill CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  3. Addison v. Louisiana Regional Landfill CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  4. Addison v. Louisiana Regional Landfill CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  5. Lee v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API