Legal Opinion

Elvins v. Delaware & Atlantic Telegraph & Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The declaration in this case charges the defendant company with breaking and entering the plaintiffs’ «lose and mutilating and cutting a number of shade and ■ornamental trees.

The writ of error is prosecuted to review the judgment rendered for the plaintiffs in the trial court.

The plaintiffs owned the premises in fee on which the trees ■stood, subject to a mortgage. The defendant offered to prove that at the time of the alleged trespass the mortgage exceeded the value of the property, and that the mortgage had been .•subsequently…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gooding v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co. v. Lehigh Zinc & Iron Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. LeedsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. North Sterling Irrigation District v. DickmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  3. McCorristin v. Salmon SignsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Jolly v. ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Van Ness v. New York & New Jersey Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API