North Sterling Irrigation District v. Dickman
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Morgan District Court. Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge. On rehearing.
1Opinion of the CourtGabbert, C. J.
Defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought an action against plaintiff in error as defendant, to recover damages. The complaint contained two causes of action. The first was for loss of crops for the years 1910 and 1911, and the second for injury to his land, as the result of seepage from a ditch constructed and operated by1 defendant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, assessing his damages on the first cause of action at $404.50, and on the second, in the sum of $6,000.00.
By the first count it was alleged in substance; that the plaintiff was the owner of an eighty acre…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Denver v. BayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Denver Circle R. v. NestorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Fleming v. LockwoodMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Middelkamp v. Bessemer Irrigating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. AdlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Hoover v. ShottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Patterson v. Horsefly Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Stephenson v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Dandrea v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.