Legal Opinion

Jolly v. Thornton

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1940No. Civ. A. 4521PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Admittedly due to the defendant’s negligence plaintiff’s automobile was wrecked and plaintiff brought this action to recover damages. A nonsuit was entered on the ground that it appeared that the plaintiff had placed a mortgage on his automobile, that he was in default at the time of the accident, and subsequently, but before this action was begun, the mortgagee took possession in order to enforce its mortgage lien and thereafter sold the mortgaged wrecked car in partial satisfaction of the mortgage debt. We have concluded that plaintiff, in spite of the facts shown, was entitled to recover,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Harris v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Samuell v. Moore Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Conlin v. CoyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. George Jue v. Irving I. Bass, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Hilliard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Hull-Dobbs Co. v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API