State v. Flores
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, j.
The defendant appeals from his conviction on one count of concealing stolen property and on a second count of unlawful possession of narcotics.
The only error assigned is the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of defendant’s apartment. Defendant contends that the affidavit presented to the magistrate was not sufficient to justify the issuance of a search warrant. We agree and reverse.
The facts are simple. On November 29, 1967, certain watches were stolen from a jewelry store in Ontario. On December 5,1967, the Justice of the Peace at Ontario…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. PetiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- State v. AlbertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
- State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.