Legal Opinion

State v. Flores

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, j.

The defendant appeals from his conviction on one count of concealing stolen property and on a second count of unlawful possession of narcotics.

The only error assigned is the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of defendant’s apartment. Defendant contends that the affidavit presented to the magistrate was not sufficient to justify the issuance of a search warrant. We agree and reverse.

The facts are simple. On November 29, 1967, certain watches were stolen from a jewelry store in Ontario. On December 5,1967, the Justice of the Peace at Ontario…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. PetiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. State v. AlbertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  5. State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API