Legal Opinion
People v. Arthur
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 1, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered October 14, 1993, which suppressed physical evidence, show-up identification and a post-arrest statement to the police as based on an unlawful detention without reasonable suspicion that a crime had been committed, unanimously reversed, on the law, suppression is denied, and the case is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with law.
Two female Transit Police officers were on plainclothes duty in the subway station at 34th Street and 8th Avenue in Manhattan, looking out for fare beaters, when they observed a man…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. LinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. PolancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. HammondsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. YoumansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.