Legal Opinion

In Re Davis

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1951No. 1065PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAGETT, Associate Judged

Respondent, who was 17 years old at the time of the alleged offense, was adjudicated guilty by a jury in Juvenile Court of taking property without right 1 and committed to the National Training School for Boys until he becomes 21. This appeal challenges his adjüdication.

At the trial respondent was represented by one counsel who filed this appeal .and made some 22 assignments of error, but such counsel has since died. and respondent’s present counsel, while formally repeating the previous assignments of error, has urged only a few of them on brief and oral argument..…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Ryan v. United States. Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. McAffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Ah Fook Chang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Robles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Ford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. In Re NicholsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API