Ryan v. United States. Duncan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
The appellants George A. Duncan and Edward Ryan, Jr., in- a joint trial by jury were found guilty of robbery. They moved for a new trial because of conversations of the prosecuting attorney with several members of the jury during recesses in the trial. They asserted they were thus prejudiced and the jury was prevented from rendering an impartial verdict. 1 The trial judge held a hearing on the motions. Several jurors and other witnesses were examined and cross-examined. The evidence shows that such conversations did occur between the prosecuting attorney ánd some members…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- John P. Tillman, Robert Barber Moore, Johnny C. Wilson, Larry Fox, Donald P. Stone and Michael W. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Frank MotenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- People v. HedgecockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Jessie Kenneth McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Randolph WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.