Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Kula 200, Wick Realty, Inc.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1981No. 7152PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, J.

Defendants interlocutorily appeal the lower court’s Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Derivative Action and for Summary Judgment.

The issue is whether the lower court correctly ruled that two limited partners may maintain a derivative action in favor of the limited partnership against the limited partnership, the two general partners, and one limited partner. We affirm.

Defendant-Appellant KULA 200 is a Hawaii limited partnership. Defendant-Appellant Wick Realty, Inc., is a Hawaii corporation and it and Defendant-Appellant Erling P. Wick are the two general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riviera Congress Associates ex rel. Lewy v. YasskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Smith Ex Rel. Carson CATV Associates v. BaderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Moore v. 1600 Downing Street, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Phillips v. KULA 200 IIHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. R. S. Ellsworth, Inc. v. Amfac Financial Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Alaska Continental Bank v. Anchorage Commercial Land AssociatesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API