R. S. Ellsworth, Inc. v. Amfac Financial Corp.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The primary question in this case is whether plaintiffs-appellants have standing to sue. The trial court ruled that plaintiffs had no such standing and granted defendants-appellees’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ suit. We affirm.
Plaintiffs-appellants are stockholders of R. S. Ellsworth, Inc., a Hawaii corporation. R. S. Ellsworth, Inc. is the sole limited partner of Hawaii Loa Ridge Ventures, a Hawaii limited partnership of which Michael Ross, Carlos Read and Hawaii Loa Ridge, Inc. (later renamed Hawaii Loa Ridge Nominee, Inc.) are general partners.
The partnership was formed for the purpose of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Riviera Congress Associates ex rel. Lewy v. YasskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Bishop Trust Co. v. Kamokila Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith Ex Rel. Carson CATV Associates v. BaderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Phillips v. Kula 200, Wick Realty, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Golden Tee, Inc. v. Venture Golf Schools, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Arndt v. First Interstate Bank of Utah N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
- Anthony v. Padmar, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Wallner v. Parry Professional Building, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.