Legal Opinion

Krieger v. City of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 2009No. A08-0750PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

In this tort case, appellant City of St. Paul challenges the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment, arguing that it was protected by recreational-use immunity and that certain elements of the trespasser-liability exception to recreational-use immunity are not met in this case. We agree, and therefore reverse and remand for entry of summary judgment in favor of appellant.

FACTS

Respondent Joan M. Krieger alleged that she tripped on a gouge in a temporary walkway located at the North Dale Recreation Center, which was owned by appellant City of St. Paul…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, and the Class of Beneficiaries, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 573.02 v. The City of Stillwater, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API