Legal Opinion
Dilworth v. Lauritzen
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1967No. 10672Published
1Opinion of the Court
18 Utah 2d 386 (1967)
424 P.2d 136
DON E. DILWORTH, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,
v.
VAUGHN K. LAURITZEN, DOING BUSINESS AS SALT LAKE SOLARAY COMPANY, DEFENDANT AND RESPONDENT.
No. 10672.
Supreme Court of Utah.
February 24, 1967.
Backman, Backman & Clark, Ralph J. Marsh, Salt Lake City, for appellant.
Davis & Bayles, Merrill K. Davis, Salt Lake City, for respondent.
ELLETT, Justice:
The plaintiff and the defendant signed a contract whereby plaintiff was given the right as a distributor of Solaray products in Salt Lake City, Utah, and as such distributor he would have the right to appoint dealers within his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Hecht v. MetzlerUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Dilworth v. LauritzenUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Ogden Livestock Shows, Inc. v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Seeley v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 1943