Arizona Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiff-appellant Arizona Water Company (“Arizona Water”) holds a certificate of convenience and necessity (“CC & N”) issued by defendant-appellee Arizona Corporation Commission (“Commission”) to provide water to specified communities within Pinal County, Arizona. Arizona Water wished to extend its service to Sandia, a new community under development in the county. Rather than award a CC & N to Arizona Water for this purpose, the Commission awarded the CC & N to intervenor-appellee Woodruff Water Company (‘Woodruff Water”), a start-up company that had not previously…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Egyptian Transportation System, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Chicago Motor Bus Co. v. Chicago Stage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Chicago & West Towns Railways, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Robin Silver v. Pueblo Del Sol Water CoArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Ruco v. AccCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015