Legal Opinion

Arizona Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 13, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 07-0167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff-appellant Arizona Water Company (“Arizona Water”) holds a certificate of convenience and necessity (“CC & N”) issued by defendant-appellee Arizona Corporation Commission (“Commission”) to provide water to specified communities within Pinal County, Arizona. Arizona Water wished to extend its service to Sandia, a new community under development in the county. Rather than award a CC & N to Arizona Water for this purpose, the Commission awarded the CC & N to intervenor-appellee Woodruff Water Company (‘Woodruff Water”), a start-up company that had not previously…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Egyptian Transportation System, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Chicago Motor Bus Co. v. Chicago Stage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Chicago & West Towns Railways, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. Robin Silver v. Pueblo Del Sol Water CoArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Ruco v. AccCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API