Legal Opinion

Phaup v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 5, 1991No. 89 C 6893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Martha Phaup (“Phaup”), Dorothy Moore (“Moore”), Shirley Fitzpatrick (“Fitzpatrick”) and Carol Maleske (“Maleske”) have sued their former employer 1 Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc. (“Pepsi”), alleging discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII,” 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 2 ). To demonstrate that claimed discrimination, plaintiffs point to events and circumstances surrounding their repeated layoffs beginning in approximately 1987 and culminating in a permanent layoff in June…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lonnell Brewer v. Board of Trustees of the University of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Strozinsky v. School District of Brown DeerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Motley v. Illinois Human Rights Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Brewer v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV. OF ILL.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2005
  5. Cato v. JilekDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API