Legal Opinion
Cato v. Jilek
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 15, 1991No. 90 C 3993PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Sheila (“Sheila”) and Joseph (“Joseph”) Cato (collectively “Catos”) and The Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities (“Council”) sue George (“George”) and Beverly (“Beverly”) Jilek (collectively “Jileks”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (“Section 1982,” part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866) 1 and under Fair Housing Act § 804 (Section 3604, part of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Sections 3601-3619) 2 for alleged discrimination in the rental of housing. Plaintiffs and Jileks have now moved separately for summary judgment under…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BranellaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- United States v. HyltonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Mhany Management Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Garden CityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- H.O.P.E., Inc. v. Lake Greenfield Homeowners Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Johnson v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.