Motley v. Illinois Human Rights Comm'n
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht
Lucille Motley appeals from the dismissal, by the Illinois Human Rights Commission (Commission), of charges of discrimination and constructive discharge. Motley alleges the Commission erred in determining there was a lack of substantial evidence in support of her charges. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
Motley began working for the Central Illinois Public Service Company (Company) as a customer information clerk in April 1985. Motley was one of four individuals employed in such a capacity. Motley is black, the other three individuals are white. The guidelines for the classification of the clerks…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phaup v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Castillo v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Saxton v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Steele v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barbara Propst and Franklin M. Propst v. Donald L. Bitzer, Morton W. Weir, Judith S. Liebman, and Robert M. BerdahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Webb v. LustigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Whipple v. Department of Rehabilitation ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Traficano v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Stone v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.