Legal Opinion

State v. Randles

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1989No. 15561, 15562PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION

The Court’s prior opinion, dated August 2, 1988, is hereby withdrawn.

BURNETT, Judge.

These are consolidated appeals from judgments of conviction entered against two defendants for manufacturing a controlled substance (marijuana) and for possessing marijuana with intent to deliver. We are asked to decide four questions: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdicts against each defendant individually; (2) whether the separate convictions for manufacturing a controlled substance and for possession with intent to deliver were inconsistent with constitutional…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. KlussIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. LedbetterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. WengrenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. KeavenyIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API