Raborn v. Buffalo
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
This is a boundary line dispute. The chancellor, in fixing the boundary in accordance with certain fences and iron pins, relied upon acquiescence in the boundary line (and to a lesser extent upon adverse possession) that continued from 1953 until 1971, this suit being filed in 1975. The pivotal issue is whether the chancellor’s conclusions are correct in view of the fact that during the 18-year period in question the right to possession along the disputed line was primarily vested in life tenants rather than in fee simple owners.
The really material facts are not in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hayden v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Stewart v. BittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Heustess v. OswaltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lammey v. EckelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Stadler v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Eva McCann, Lola May Covell, and Irene Mendes v. William Randal Cross, Laura Lea Cross, and Farm Credit Services of Western Arkansas, FlcaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022