Legal Opinion

Heustess v. Oswalt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 8, 1973No. 5-6105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

This is an adverse possession case. The trial court held that appellee Mary E. Oswalt (plaintiff below) had by adverse possession acquired title to fifteen acres to which appellant O. J. Gandy, Jr., recently acquired record title from his co-appellant, Heustess. For reversal appellants contend (1) that the claim of appellee was not adverse to her brother, Matthew Heustess, (2) that there was no adverse possession for the full statutory period, (3) that the entry was permissive, and (4) that the findings of the court were not supported by clear, cogent, and convincing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. KapplerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Meadows v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Hamilton v. FarmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Luster v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Raborn v. BuffaloSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API