Legal Opinion
Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Bogorff
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 12, 2010No. 4D08-4474PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFarmer, J.
The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DACS) appeals a final judgment in favor of a class of more than 50,000 owners of healthy citrus trees in Broward County cut down and destroyed by DACS as part of its citrus canker eradication program (CCEP).1 *87The trial judge found that over 100,000 non-commercial trees in the County not affected with citrus canker had been taken and destroyed by DACS during the covered period, that the taking was for a public purpose, and that the owners of these residential trees were entitled to just and fair compensation for their healthy trees.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DEPT. OF AGR. & CONSUMER SERVS. v. BogorffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. BogorffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. MendezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013