Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Bogorff
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
The Department of Agriculture appeals an award of attorney’s fees in a class action for inverse condemnation in which the class prevailed. Primarily, it argues that the court erred by not using the “benefits achieved” standard of section 73.091, Florida Statutes (2009), when the Department made a “written offer” to the class members by sending each of them a letter enclosing an application for compensation provided under section 581.1845, Florida Statutes (2001). We hold that the letter was not a written offer as contemplated by the statute. With the exception of fees incurred by the class…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. PalmaSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Garner v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. PolkSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- FLA. DEPT. OF AGR. AND CONSUMER SERVICES v. City of Pompano BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Kaufman v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.